0

Hot Tub Time Machine Thoughts

Posted by Andrew on Mar 28, 2010 in Showbiz

hot-tub-time-machine-01Before I discuss the story problems with this film, I want to preface it. I’ve been looking forward to this movie for months. John Cusack, the king of the 80’s, returning to an era he knows all too well, joined by talented funny guys, how could it go wrong? But while the concept was fun, it missed a lot of marks.

1) Humor — this movie has been advertised as a raunchy, crazy comedy, but it didn’t really do that at all. There were some subtle jokes thrown in the film, which I appreciated, but the laughs just weren’t frequent enough. I found scenes where it appeared they didn’t try to put any sort of jokes in it. For screenwriters the universal rule is there needs to be at least a joke on every page. Even if it’s not the funniest joke every written, you need something for everyone included.

2) Time Travel Talk — they spend way too much time discussing the theory of time travel, or how it worked, yada yada. At this point in the history of cinema, everyone has seen a few time travel movies. We get it. Just move on. Take a cue from Coppola’s only comedy (from the 80’s) “Peggy Sue Got Married.” Just jump into the story, let the characters and audience figure out what’s going on as the story continues. Don’t stop the action so these guys can sit in a room for what felt like 5 minutes.

3) The bad guy sucked — big time. The big “rival” to Rob Corddry’s character was hardly threatening, and I never felt like the guys were ever in any real danger of not returning. Part of the problem is you don’t ever meet this character until a third into the film, which is a real problem. The script needed to take a closer viewing of Back To The Future and see how they handled Biff, introducing him as a jackass who controls Marty’s Fathers life, to the end, where he kisses his ass.

4) The whole premise of Hot Tub Time Machine is that they travel back in time. And that’s why we are in our theater seats! So why do they wait until Act 2 before they FINALLY travel back in time? Too long! Too much backstory! I want to see these guys rip apart and make fun of people in the 80’s, not bitch and moan for the first 20 minutes about their lives.

I really wanted to love this film, it was aware the premise was ridiculous and was ready to go crazy. But then they backed off by trying to instill more of a deeper meaning into the film, which wasn’t going to work. Would I watch it again? Sure, but only for the actors…

 
0

RIP Tonight Show With Conan O’Brien

Posted by Andrew on Jan 26, 2010 in Showbiz

the_tonight_show_with_conan_obrienAnd just like that, he’s gone. It’s been an interesting few weeks with all the back and forth negotiations between NBC and Conan, with Leno and Letterman stirred in. There was always a small hope of mine that perhaps they could figure out some alternative plan and keep Conan around, but apparently it wasn’t in the cards. I’m glad I was able to at least participate in history, as one of the first audience members to ever see his show, and now a small group who ever attended during its brief run. Perhaps now my Tonight Show hat and ticket are worth something.

For those who haven’t watched the final episode, small spoiler alert — Will Ferrell sings a cover of Free Bird with one of the ZZ Tops, Beck, and Ben Harper, along with Conan and the tonight show band. I thought it was an appropriate song, especially since it belongs to Lynyrd Skynyrd, who only got to experience a few years of success before a horrible plane crash that killed several members.

Part of Conans downfall that caused him to bleed viewers was that he abandoned his form — what made his success. He hardly brought any of the characters or skits with him to LA. He felt that those wouldn’t be kosher during an 11:30 time slot, but what only ended up happening was he alienated himself from his fan base and made a generic late night show for the Leno audience. Problem is his humor doesn’t appeal to the Leno audience. Even Conan toned down, they still aren’t into him. Perhaps he’ll be better suited on another network though, and be able to return to what made him a success — random, ridiculous skits that don’t attempt to be anything but funny.

 
0

An Open Challenge

Posted by Andrew on Apr 24, 2009 in Showbiz

sex driveI’d like to issue a challenge to screenwriters who pen teen comedies. Push yourself. Try to do more than dick and fart jokes. I know it’s difficult, give it a shot.

I watched a trailer for another cookie cutter teen comedy, I Love You Beth Cooper. I had a couple ‘heh’s, but that’s about it. The whole shock humor genre is on its way out, and some recent teen flops (Sex Drive, College) are the flare. I think American Pie really led the charge, which was released 10 years ago! Although to give it credit, the story/characters were much more interesting and genuine then the million imitations we’ve come to see since it’s release.

You can tell the comedy tide is shifting, when Judd Apatow’s latest film is not like anything he’s done. He’s already been there, done that with 40 Year Old Virgin/Knocked Up/Superbad. It’s time to no longer only appeal to the lowest common denominator. Judd has been somewhat of a trend leader with the resurgence of R-rated comedies, so it’s interesting to see him lead off in a different way.

Just my two cents on it all; I’m sick of seeing movies greenlit who’s plot is as paper thin as its characters with jokes that were written by 8-year-olds, for 8-year-olds.

 
0

Hollywood's Big Six & The Future

Posted by Andrew on Mar 29, 2009 in Showbiz

universal_picturesI just finished reading Time magazines article on “The End of Excess,” and one part that particularly struck me was that during the 70’s, a time of renewed entrepreneurship and creative thinkers, Microsoft and Apple were formed. So I began to think, how can a business today do things in a fresh and more efficient way than it’s already being done?

For starters, I think it’s time for a period of selling off. I’m talking about the big six. When people talk about Hollywood Studios, they’re more often referring to Warner Bros., Fox, Disney, Sony, Paramount and Universal. What’s happened is studios are now owned by huge conglomerates. Universal/NBC is owned by GE, Fox by News Corp, Sony… duh, Disney… double duh, Paramount owned by Viacom, and Warner Bros. by Time Warner.

Your asking, so what, why does it matter they’re owned by a bigger company, more exposure right? Well lets look at it this way. When GE sees profits shrink up in their Aviation/Industrial/Railway division (pick one), they need to divert funds from other segments of their company to help things out. As a result, Universal is forced to layoff. This doesn’t only occur at Universal as you can imagine. Not only do people lose their jobs, but fewer projects are getting the green light as they make cut backs. Variety has reported that 2011 will see a cutback of films being released. Granted, the credit crisis is one factor in the equation, but doesn’t help nonethless.

In my opinion, I think it would be better if the studios went back to being independently owned. Despite the economic recession, box office sales are doing just as good as any other recent year, so why not take advantage of the market? Allowing a company to be judged solely on the performance of its executives/talent/products is the only way to do business, instead of just lumping it together with the other unrelated (losing) branches.

 
0

Another Remake

Posted by Andrew on Mar 2, 2009 in Showbiz

total_recallI used to think Hollywood was about creativity, the best of the best, where money and talent goes to make something awesome. Then I discovered the truth, especially in more recent times. Independent films is where creativity goes, because the studio system has almost given up on creating fresh ideas. This post is spurred by the recent news that a Total Recall remake is on track. Yes, the 1990 film starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. Because apparently its TOO OLD? Utterly ridiculous. You want to remake a movie, pick some old Cary Grant movie. With this mind set we’ll be seeing a Back to the Future remake soon.

 
3

Joaquin Phoenix

Posted by Andrew on Feb 14, 2009 in Showbiz

I felt I just had to share this clip since its just so funny. There’s been some speculation that its all an act, but Joaquin Phoenix was on Letterman and gave a very awkward, weird interview. If you appreciate the humor on The Office then you’ll surely enjoy this interview. Whether its all an act or not, it’s worth watching.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDZl22QUl20

 
0

The Judd Apatow Ripple Effect

Posted by Andrew on Jan 11, 2009 in Showbiz

Zack and miriI caught Zack and Miri Make a Porno at my local $1.50 theater, and thought it was pretty entertaining. It had some unforgettable gags and is a movie worth watching again. I went home and looked up the reviews for it on RottenTomatoes, and was a little surprised about how much it was bashed. Particularly the most annoying thing was how much the critics would try to size up Kevin Smith to Judd Apatow. Apparently since 40 year old virgin, there is a bar held out at a certain height, and you must clear the Judd Bar. Why do they insist that Kevin Smith, the pioneer of witty dialogue and offensive jokes, have all the same moments and beats?

It’s as if any family film must be the same as a John Hughes flick or its no good. What’s even more ridiculous is that these reviewers/critics now complain of the Apatow formula as tiresome, and that bro-mance has been overdone. These are probably the same people who weren’t followers of Freaks and Geeks or Undeclared, but have jumped on the Apatow bandwagon now. I will agree Zack and Miri pulled a few punches, instead of going for the throat they went sappy. But that’s what you get for a family man nearing 40. All I can say is bring on March when new comedy’s start hitting the screen.

Congrats on the Golden Globe for recognizing Heath Ledger for The Dark Knight.

 
0

Future at EW?

Posted by Andrew on Dec 29, 2008 in Showbiz

I don’t know which it is - either I have a future career writing for Entertainment Weekly (see below post)… or they need to hire people who spend more than 1 second thinking up article titles.

‘Marley & Me’ top dog at weekend box office

 
0

Cinema's Still Strong

Posted by Andrew on Dec 4, 2008 in Showbiz

As the economy continues to spiral downward as the problems continue to compound, there is still an industry going strong. Your local box office. Despite people having less money, people still continue to go to the theater, so as long as there is worthwhile films to watch. Unfortunately less funding is available to the production companies due to everybody tightening up their wallets, but this continues to display that even in times of economic hardship, people still need to escape their lives for two hours. Let’s hope the SAG doesn’t go on strike, and things start to turn around.

 
0

Slow News Day

Posted by Andrew on Dec 2, 2008 in Comedy in Life, Showbiz

You may wonder, how do I know this? And then I’ll tell you. Because IMDB has posted a news article about Lindsay Lohan complaining about getting locked out of her account on Facebook. Yes, quite the news indeed. I’m wondering if IMDB has hired someone who sits there and is told, if Lindsay updates her MySpace blog, I want you to copy what she says and post it on our site. This is CRITICAL. I don’t think I could ever be a journalist, particularly for a magazine like People, because I’d have to write articles about topics that in the real world mean absolutely nothing. IMDB, if I cared what Lindsay thought of things, I’d read her myspace page. OH gotta go, Paris just updated her blog!

Copyright © 2010 andrewmerfeld.com All rights reserved.